Profits Are Likely To Continue As The Affordable Care Act
نویسندگان
چکیده
To better understand the financial viability of hospital emergency departments (EDs), we created national estimates of the cost to hospitals of providing ED care and the associated hospital revenue using hospital financial reports and patient claims data from 2009. We then estimated the effect the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will have on the future profitability of providing ED care. We estimated that hospital revenue from ED care exceeded costs for that care by $6.1 billion in 2009, representing a profit margin of 7.8 percent (net revenue expressed as a percentage of total revenue). However, this is primarily because hospitals make enough profit on the privately insured ($17 billion) to cover underpayment from all other payer groups, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and unreimbursed care. Assuming current payer reimbursement rates, ACA reforms could result in an additional 4.4-percentage-point increase in profit margins for hospital-based EDs compared to what could be the case without the reforms. T here is increasing financial pressure being placed on hospitals. Payment cuts inMedicare andMedicaid, coupled with tighter restrictions from private insurance, have reduced the rate of hospital revenuegrowth to its lowest level in decades. Although all parts of hospitals are under financial pressures, the emergency department (ED)may be particularly vulnerable. Emergency care has high fixed costs in terms of standby capacity, or the additional resources needed to accommodate large increases inpatients that could result, for example, from natural disasters, accidents, or pandemics. EDs also provide care for low-acuity visits at a substantially higher cost to insurers than similar outpatient care, and they treat many patients who do not have insurance or have insurance that pays poorly. To date, however, little is known about ED finances. Are EDs significant money losers, as a cursory look at their payer mix would suggest? Or are they gateways to admission for complex, well-insuredpatients andotherdownstreamoutpatient services, and thus profitable aspects of the health care system for hospitals? The literature is mixed on this topic. There are some indications that EDs are profitable for hospitals. From 2000 to 2006, despite an 11.6 percent decrease in inpatient bed capacity, the average ED bed capacity increased by 15 percent. Indeed, the majority of ED closures are associated with the closing of the entire hospital, not a selective closing of that department. Furthermore, the emergence of freestanding EDs in somemarkets suggests that emergency care is profitable—at least for some visits. There are also indications to the contrary. ED payment for the most vulnerable patients, who frequently depend on ED availability, has declined in real terms. Between 2003 and 2008 Medicaid physicianpayments for careother than primary care grew at 1.5 percent annually, compared to growth in the Consumer Price Index of doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0754
منابع مشابه
Prevention under the Affordable Care Act (ACA): Has the ACA Overpromised and under Delivered?; Comment on “Interrelation of Preventive Care Benefits and Shared Costs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)”
This policy brief discusses preventive care benefits and cost-sharing included in health insurance provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation and highlights some consequences to Americans and the country in terms of healthcare costs and value.
متن کاملInterrelation of Preventive Care Benefits and Shared Costs under the Affordable Care Act (ACA)
With the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), access to insurance and coverage of preventive care services has been expanded. By removing the barrier of shared costs for preventive care, it is expected that an increase in utilization of preventive care services will reduce the cost of chronic diseases. Early detection and treatment is anticipated to be less costly than treatment at ...
متن کاملHealth System Reform in the United States
In 2010, the United States adopted its first-ever comprehensive set of health system reforms in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Implementation of the law, though politically contentious and controversial, has now reached a stage where reversal of most elements of the law is no longer feasible. The controversial portions of the law that expand affordable health insurance coverage to most U.S. cit...
متن کاملDoes the Accountable Care Act Aim to Promote Quality, Health, and Control Costs or Has It Missed the Mark? ;Comment on “Health System Reform in the United States”
McDonough’s perspective on healthcare reform in the US provides a clear, coherent analysis of the mix of access and delivery reforms in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) aka Obamacare. As noted by McDonough, this major reform bill is designed to expand access for health coverage that includes both prevention and treatment benefits among uninsured Americans. Additionally, this legislation includes s...
متن کاملThe patient protection and affordable care act: effects on dental care.
Health care reform has been a subject of debate long before the presidential campaign of 2008, through the presidential signing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) on March 23, 2010, and is likely to continue as a topic of discussion well into the future. The effects of this historic reform on the delivery of healthcare and on the economy are subject to speculation. While ...
متن کاملStabilizing and Strengthening ACA Nongroup Markets
In Brief Uncertainty about federal support for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) continues to threaten enrollment and stability in the nongroup insurance markets. Meanwhile, congressional Republicans are likely to continue their efforts to repeal and replace the law. But targeted policies could fix the ACA’s problems without sacrificing its gains in coverage, affordability, and access to care. Thes...
متن کامل